Scavender

Point and click suits an apocalypse better than most forms do, because it makes you look at things instead of shooting them. Multiple endings implies choices that stick, and with the Walking Dead in its ancestry you can guess the flavour: somebody doesn't make it out. I'm always up for a small adventure that takes its own ruined world seriously tho.

Good one to have open when you don't fancy anything with reflexes in it. You click on stuff, you talk to people, you work out where to go next. Slow, but the good kind of slow.

Multiple endings is the load-bearing claim here, and in a short adventure that phrase usually means two or three variants of one final screen rather than branches with consequences behind them. Nothing in the description pushes back on that. It'll be a perfectly pleasant sit. I just can't point at the reason to send somebody to it.

point and click with real branching, which is more ambition than most of these attempt. The endings do diverge. I played it twice and arrived somewhere meaningfully different second time. Puzzle logic wanders off to the moon now and again, but never for long enough to make you quit.